ArticleResearch in pharmaceutical sciences2025
Designing of a novel chimeric antimicrobial peptide against
Article in Research in pharmaceutical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Macroalgal Bloom Biomass as a Source of Bioactive Compounds and Antimicrobial Peptides.Marine drugs · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: The study aimed to design new chimeric antimicrobial peptides targeting Experimental approach: To design new chimeric peptides targeting Findings/Results: The M-CIT peptide was selected for synthesis in the first method, but it did not show significant activity against the target bacteria (MIC = 187.5 μM and MBC = 375 μM). In the second method, no suitable score was observed. However, the M-PEX12 peptide was synthesized in the second method, demonstrating antimicrobial activity against Conclusion and implications: Three methods were evaluated for designing new chimeric peptides, and the third method, which involved modifying the number of amino acids in the parental peptides while maintaining their similarity, was found to be the most suitable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.