Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40444117›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Development of a Simple Protocol to Assess Glucose Release After In Vitro Digestion, Allowing Comparison of Starchy Foods.

Thomas Montebugnoli, Giorgia Antonelli, Elena Chiarello, Nicholas S Rivera, Giulia Camporesi, Francesca Danesi, Alessandra Bordoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas MontebugnoliDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL) Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna Cesena Italy.
Giorgia AntonelliDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL) Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna Cesena Italy.
Elena ChiarelloDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL) Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna Cesena Italy.
Nicholas S RiveraDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL) Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna Cesena Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7747-9333
Giulia CamporesiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL) Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna Cesena Italy.
Francesca DanesiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL) Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna Cesena Italy.
Alessandra BordoniDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL) Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna Cesena Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4579-1662

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diets including foods with low glycemic index have been proposed to reverse the rising incidence of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Unfortunately, many common starchy staple foods have a high glycemic index. Several strategies for producing foods with low glycemic index have been proposed, but their application by the food industry is limited by the difficulty and cost of measuring GI in vivo. The aim of the present study was to develop a simple and reliable protocol to assess glucose release after in vitro digestion, and to use it to compare commercial starchy foods. To this purpose, a final starch digestion step was included in the INFOGEST in vitro digestion protocol by adding the enzyme amyloglucosidase, which mimicked the action of brush border enzymes. Glucose release was evaluated in five starchy foods (flour, bread, crackers, and

Indexed as

glucose releaseglycemic indexin vitro digestionstarchy foods

Identifiers

PMID40444117
PMCPMC12121517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.