ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers' Acceptance of Irradiated Food.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food irradiation enhances food safety and shelf life, but consumer acceptance in China is hindered by radiation-related misconceptions and low awareness. This study investigated 556 Chinese consumers through an online survey, analyzing demographic influences and attitudes via SPSSAU. The key findings revealed a strong preference for the term "ionized food" (69% acceptance) over "irradiated food" (31%), particularly among those with nuclear risk concerns. This finding highlights the notion that the use of the label "ionized food" can avoid knee-jerk associations with nuclear radiation. When the term "irradiated food" is employed, clear explanations of what irradiated food involves should be provided on food labels. While over 80% of the respondents recognized conventional sterilization methods (e.g., pasteurization), only 17% identified irradiation. Demographic analysis showed higher initial acceptance among men and the 26-45 age group (75% willingness), although disclosure of everyday irradiated products (e.g., spices, snacks) triggered resistance, especially among women (77% of reversals). Education positively correlated with acceptance, with doctoral students showing 64.5% approval. Notably, 65.6% of initially willing consumers rejected irradiated foods after learning about inconspicuous labeling, reflecting distrust in market transparency. Mobile platforms (WeChat, TikTok) were preferred for science communication (70%), while older adults favored community outreach. Targeted science communication campaigns should be launched to dispel radiation-related misconceptions. Governments should also customize strategies for different demographic groups, particularly to address the concerns of students, women, and elderly individuals. By leveraging digital media and collaborating with schools, communities, and businesses, consumers can be effectively educated, their concerns can be alleviated, and trust in irradiated food can be enhanced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.