ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Herbal and alternative medicine use: a cross sectional study to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of use in cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Herbal and alternative medicine is increasingly used among cancer patients to manage disease, symptoms, and improve quality of life. Reported usage rates worldwide vary from 3.5% to 90%. Understanding prevalence and predictors of such use is essential for safety and efficacy, especially considering potential interactions with conventional treatments. Methods: This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of herbal medicine use among cancer patients in Jordan. All cancer patients, including pediatric and adult patients who can give consent or assent, were included in the study. Results: Out of 602 patients surveyed, 163 (27.1%) reported using herbal medicine. Among users, 68.7% were female, 52.9% had lower education levels, and 60% were unemployed. Of the key predictors: lower income (OR = 3.24, p = 0.021) and self-perceived knowledge of herbal medicine (OR = 18.9, p < 0.001). Knowledge assessment revealed that 54% relied on social media for information, while only 11% consulted healthcare professionals. Between 60% and 80% of patients were unaware of potential interactions between herbal treatments and cancer therapies. Additionally, the 85% reported that their healthcare providers did not inform them about these risks. Reasons for using herbs and alternative included maintaining health (52.4%) and cancer treatment (47.6%). Among non-users, 29% doubted its effectiveness, and 34% felt uninformed. Conclusion: The study revealed that low income and high self-perceived awareness about herbal medicine are key predictors of herbal usage. However, there is a significant knowledge gap, with many patients relying on social media and being unaware of potential interactions with oncology treatments. Customized educational interventions are needed to address these factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.