ArticleJournal of pain research2025
"Do Doctors and Patients Have Different Understandings of Pain?" - A Pilot Study of Different Perspectives and Understandings of Pain in Clinical Pain Research.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are Conditioned Pain Modulation and Pain Sensitivity Risk Factors for the Development of Functional Somatic Disorder? A Longitudinal Population-Based Study.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
- The Need for Continued Investment in Digital Pain Assessment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Ambiguous results on pain thresholds often occur from biomedical pain research. Although results and methods are frequently discussed, only few studies have investigated participants' understanding and perspectives of pain in research settings. The aim of this qualitative pilot study was to explore different understandings of pain in a clinical pain research setting. Methods: We briefly interviewed 25 subjects, including Danish pain doctors and psychiatrists as well as pain patients, depressed patients, and healthy controls (five in each group) about their understanding of pain. Results: Laymen seem less inclined to verbalize pain than professionals. In addition, they may embrace a concept of suffering that goes beyond the traditional body-mind dichotomy. Since suffering may be part of the pain experience, this difference in the understanding of pain may be at the core of the often ambiguous results when doctors and other health professionals study pain. Conclusion: The results emphasize the need for supporting the ongoing process of integrating broad perspectives on pain in clinical pain research, including the concept of suffering. More research and resources are needed in this particular area of pain medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.