Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443994›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Synthetic vs. non-synthetic sweeteners: their differential effects on gut microbiome diversity and function.

Alex Kidangathazhe, Theresah Amponsah, Abhijit Maji, Seidu Adams, Maria Chettoor, Xiuqing Wang, Joy Scaria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alex KidangathazheDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Theresah AmponsahDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Abhijit MajiDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Seidu AdamsDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Maria ChettoorDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Xiuqing WangDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Joy ScariaDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising use of artificial sweeteners, favored for their zero-calorie content and superior sweetness, necessitates understanding their impact on the gut microbiome. This study examines the effects of five common artificial sweeteners-Acesulfame K, Rebaudioside A, Saccharin, Sucralose, and Xylitol-on gut microbiome diversity using minibioreactor arrays. Fecal samples from three healthy individuals were used to inoculate bioreactors that were subsequently supplemented with each sweetener. Over 35 days, microbial diversity and network composition were analyzed. Results revealed synthetic sweeteners like Sucralose and Saccharin significantly reduced microbial diversity, while non-synthetic sweeteners, particularly Rebaudioside A and Xylitol, were less disruptive. Acesulfame K increased diversity but disrupted network structure, suggesting potential long-term negative impacts on microbiome resilience. Sucralose enriched pathogenic families such as Enterobacteriaceae, whereas natural sweeteners promoted beneficial taxa like Lachnospiraceae. Random Matrix Theory (RMT) based analysis highlighted distinct microbial interaction patterns, with Acesulfame K causing persistent structural changes. Findings suggest non-synthetic sweeteners may be more favorable for gut health than synthetic ones, emphasizing cautious use, particularly for those with gut health concerns. This study enhances our understanding of artificial sweeteners' effects on the gut microbiome, highlighting the need for further research into their long-term health implications.

Indexed as

acesulfame Kartificial sweetenerbioreactorgut microbiomerebaudioside Asaccharinsucralosexylitol

Identifiers

PMID40443994
PMCPMC12119465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.