ArticleAdvances in rehabilitation science and practice
Refilling Intrathecal Drug Delivery Pumps Outside the Clinic: Survey of Practice in the United Kingdom.
Article in Advances in rehabilitation science and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Many people with spasticity or pain managed with intrathecal drug delivery pumps have very impaired mobility and are at high risk of developing pressure sores, which may prevent them from travelling to a clinic in their wheelchair. Some patients may be transported by stretcher, but some will be bedbound at home. Routinely refilling all pumps at home is established practice in several parts of Europe and USA. Method: Freedom of information requests were emailed to trusts and health boards hosting intrathecal drug delivery services in the UK and Ireland, asking about frequency of home visits for pump refills, how many staff travelled, use of prefilled syringes and how they would manage a patient's long-term inability to attend clinic. Results: Detailed data was received from all but 1 of 54 active clinics in the UK, but Irish legislation did not allow this data to be returned. Two thousand one hundred forty-five patients were managed with intrathecal pumps in the UK. Eleven services had less than 10 patients and 5 had more than 100. Twenty-one services did less than 1 home refill/year and 9 did more than 12/year. Twenty had travelled to patients more than 50 miles from the clinic, or to an island. Twenty-two services would send 2 clinicians and 10 would bring prefilled sterile syringes, rather than aspirate from bottles at the bedside. Conclusion: FoI requests can generate a very high response rate in the UK. Many services manage a small number of patients, which would make it difficult to provide cover when a single-handed clinician is unavailable or to train a second clinician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.