ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Brucellosis Research: Insights from CNKI and Web of Science Databases (2014-2023).
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From immunological mechanisms to targeted therapies: a bibliometric analysis of vitiligo treatment research (2005-2025).Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the current status, research hotspots, and frontiers of brucellosis from 2014 to 2023 using data from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Web of Science (WoS) via CiteSpace, and to provide new insights for researchers in the field. Material and Methods: Articles related to brucellosis published from 2014 to 2023 were retrieved from CNKI and WoS databases. CiteSpace V.6.3.R3 was employed to generate network maps and perform bibliometric analysis. Results: A total of 467 references from CNKI and 3686 references from WoS were analyzed. In CNKI, the annual publication trend showed a decline, with Xu Liqing, Ma Li, and Yang Xuxin being the most prolific authors, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention being the leading institution. The keyword cluster analysis identified 13 main clusters, while the keyword emergence map highlighted 15 keywords with the strongest emergence intensity. In contrast, WoS displayed an increasing trend in annual publications, with Heinrich Neubauer, Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB), and China as the top contributors in terms of authors, institutions, and countries, respectively. "Infection" was the most frequently occurring keyword. WoS analysis revealed 16 primary clusters and 25 keywords with high emergence intensity. Conclusion: Between 2014 and 2023, CNKI saw a slight dip in brucellosis studies, while WoS research on it gained growing attention. CNKI literature primarily focuses on epidemiology, clinical manifestations, complications, and diagnostic methods, while WoS literature emphasizes pathogenesis and public health management. Effective prevention and control of brucellosis require interdisciplinary, cross-sectoral, and transnational cooperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.