Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443962›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025

Impact of nivolumab monotherapy infusion time-of-day on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Yasunobu Ishizuka, Yukiya Narita, Tomoki Sakakida, Munehiro Wakabayashi, Hiroyuki Kodama, Kazunori Honda, Toshiki Masuishi, Hiroya Taniguchi, Shigenori Kadowaki, Masashi Ando and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Circadian rhythms and lung cancer biology and immunotherapy: Emerging opportunities and challenges.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yasunobu IshizukaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3305-4013
Yukiya NaritaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8681, Japan.
Tomoki SakakidaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Munehiro WakabayashiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroyuki KodamaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Kazunori HondaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Toshiki MasuishiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroya TaniguchiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Shigenori KadowakiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Masashi AndoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Masahiro TajikaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Kei MuroDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are used either as monotherapy or in combination with cytotoxic agents in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). Studies show that circadian rhythms are essential for immune system functions, including anticancer immunity. Objectives: This study evaluated whether the time of day of nivolumab infusion altered the efficacy of mGC treatment. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 296 consecutive patients with mGC who received nivolumab monotherapy between December 2014 and December 2022. Patients were divided into early (EA)- and late (LA)-nivolumab infusion groups: the EA and LA groups received ⩾70% and <70% of their infusions before 14:00, respectively. Treatment efficacy was compared between the groups. Results: A total of 248 patients were eligible: 140 and 108 in the EA and LA groups, respectively. Most baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, except for differences in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the EA than in the LA group (median PFS, 2.3 vs 1.6 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.65; Conclusion: Our data suggest that scheduling nivolumab infusions before mid-afternoon should be considered in daily practice for the treatment of mGC.

Indexed as

circadian rhythmgastric cancerimmunotherapynivolumabprognosis

Identifiers

PMID40443962
PMCPMC12120291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.