Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443937›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Urban-rural disparities in fall risk among older Chinese adults: insights from machine learning-based predictive models.

LiHan Lin, XiaoYang Liu, CaiHua Cai, YiKun Zheng, Delong Li, GuoPeng Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

LiHan LinCollege of Physical Education, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, China.
XiaoYang LiuCollege of Physical Education, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, China.
CaiHua CaiCollege of Physical Education, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, China.
YiKun ZhengCollege of Physical Education, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, China.
Delong LiDepartment of Cardiology, Fujian Medical University Affiliated First Quanzhou Hospital, Quanzhou, China.
GuoPeng HuCollege of Physical Education, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Falls among older adults are a significant challenge to global healthy aging. Identifying key factors and differences in fall risks, along with developing predictive models, is essential for differentiated and precise interventions in China's urban and rural older populations. Methods: The data of 5,876 older adults were obtained from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (Waves 2015 and 2018). A total of 87 baseline input variables were considered as candidate features. Predictive models for fall risk over the next 3 years among urban and rural older populations were developed using five machine learning algorithms. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify key factors influencing falls in these populations. Results: The fall incidence among older adults was 22.4%, with 23.2% in rural areas and 20.9% in urban areas. Common risk factors across both settings include gender, age, fall history, sleep duration, activities of daily living questionnaire scores, memory status, and chair stand test time. In rural areas, additional risks include being unmarried, having diabetes, heart disease, memory-related medication use, and living in houses built 6-20 years ago. For urban, liver disease, arthritis, physical disabilities, depressive symptoms, weak hand strength, poor relations with children, and digestive medication use are significant risk factors while living in a tidy environment is protective. Random Forest models achieved the highest AUC-ROC and sensitivity in both rural (AUC = 0.732, 95% CI: 0.69-0.78; sensitivity = 0.669) and urban (AUC = 0.734, 95% CI: 0.68-0.79; sensitivity = 0.754) areas. Decision curve analysis confirmed the model's clinical utility across a range of threshold probabilities. Key predictors included prior experience of falling, gender, and chair stand test performance in rural areas, while in urban areas, experience of falling, gender, and age were the most influential features. Conclusion: The key factors influencing falls among older people differ between urban and rural areas, and the predictive models effectively identify high-risk populations in both settings. This facilitates targeted prevention and precise interventions, supporting healthy aging in China.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsMachine LearningRural PopulationUrban PopulationActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHealth InequitiesHealth SurveysHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle Agedagingfall riskmachine learningolder peoplepublic healthrural–urban difference

Identifiers

PMID40443937
PMCPMC12121405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.