ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
An exploration of current and future vector-borne disease threats and opportunities for change.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Species composition, environmental determinants, and spatial risk of mosquito breeding sites in urban Libreville, Gabon.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- America First and Global Health Last: Assessing the Policy's Ripple Effects on Tropical Disease Control and Health Sovereignty in Sub-Sahara Africa.International journal of health policy and management · 2026Article
- RNA metagenomic profiling of mosquito viromes associated with Vector-Borne diseases in Quebec, Canada.PloS one · 2026Article
- Zika Virus: A Tale of Two Lineages.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Why the Jenner/Pasteur paradigm is insufficient for controlling vector-borne diseases and the role of microbiota-mediated interactions.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025Review
- Editorial: Unravelling insect vector diversity: genetic and phenotypic insights from the Global South.Frontiers in insect science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vector-borne diseases, including dengue, threaten the health and livelihoods of over 80% of the world's population, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. Environmental, ecological, climatic, and socio-economic factors are expected to drive increased transmission, emphasizing the need to identify key threats and prioritize strategies for control. We examined drivers, challenges and potential solutions with global experts, using Brazil and India as case studies. Both countries face rapid population growth, unplanned urbanization and increased exposure to animal reservoirs alongside unique surveillance and control challenges. We advocate for improvements in surveillance systems and capacity, investment in sustainable vector control tools, leveraging of artificial intelligence for outbreak prediction, and fostering public-private partnerships to develop innovative interventions. A multifaceted approach, combining community-led initiatives with advanced technologies, is essential to reducing the burden of vector-borne diseases and preventing future epidemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.