Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443933›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Community-level determinants of loneliness and social isolation: a population-based cohort study across younger and older adults.

Drew Eleanor Meehan, Philip Clare, Anne Grunseit, Dafna Merom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Loneliness is correlated with cancer mortality in US counties: an ecological analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Temporal patterns of loneliness and their associations with mental health outcomes: Observations from a longitudinal study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Drew Eleanor MeehanSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.
Philip ClarePrevention Research Collaboration, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anne GrunseitSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Dafna MeromSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Loneliness and social isolation (SI) are critical public health issues with well-documented effects on health and well-being. However, much of existing observational and intervention research has focused predominantly on individual-and interpersonal-level factors. This longitudinal study addresses significant knowledge gaps by comprehensively examining the independent influence of multiple community-level determinants on loneliness and SI and uniquely comparing these effects across younger (18-30 year) and older (60 + years) adults within an Australian population cohort over a 12-year period. Methods: Using longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, we analysed data from four wave pairs (2006/07, 2010/11, 2014/15, 2018/19) to investigate associations between loneliness and SI and nine community and neighbourhood-level variables. We employed lagged mixed-effects Poisson regression models to calculate risk ratios (RR) adjusted for individual-and interpersonal-level factors. Results: Our findings reveal that low community engagement is the strongest risk factor for loneliness and SI in both younger (Loneliness, RR = 1.34; SI, RR = 1.58) and older populations (Loneliness, RR = 1.35; SI = 2.02). Low neighbourhood social cohesion was found to significantly increase loneliness and SI in older adults (Loneliness, RR = 1.15; SI, RR = 1.36) and to increase SI in younger adults (RR = 1.54). We also observed distinct age-specific effects, with cultural practices, altruism, and perceived neighbourhood safety having differential impacts across age groups. Discussion: Our findings highlight the critical need for community-level interventions to address loneliness and SI, suggesting that focusing solely on individual-related factors is insufficient. Tailoring public health strategies to enhance community dynamics may be essential in reducing loneliness and SI among vulnerable populations, particularly in areas with low social cohesion and community engagement offerings.

Indexed as

LonelinessNeighborhood CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsSocial IsolationAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAustraliaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRisk Factorscommunity-levellonelinesslongitudinalpublic healthsocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID40443933
PMCPMC12119266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.