Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443932›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Unveiling sub-populations in critical care settings: a real-world data approach in COVID-19.

Wesley Anderson, Ruth Gould, Namrata Patil, Nicholas Mohr, Kenneth Dodd, Danielle Boyce, Pam Dasher, Philippe J Guerin, Reham Khan, Sreekanth Cheruku and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Wesley AndersonCritical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Ruth GouldCenters of Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Namrata PatilBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Nicholas MohrUniversity of Iowa Healthcare, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Kenneth DoddAdvocate Aurora Health, Downers Grove, IL, United States.
Danielle BoyceTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Pam DasherCritical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Philippe J GuerinInfectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, United Kingdom.
Reham KhanSociety of Critical Care Medicine, Mount Prospect, IL, United States.
Sreekanth CherukuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States.
Vishakha K KumarSociety of Critical Care Medicine, Mount Prospect, IL, United States.
Ewy MathéNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rockville, MD, United States.
Aneesh K MehtaDepartment of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Andrew P MichelsonWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Andrew WilliamsTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Smith F HeavnerCritical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Jagdeep T PodichettyCritical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Disease presentation and progression can vary greatly in heterogeneous diseases, such as COVID-19, with variability in patient outcomes, even within the hospital setting. This variability underscores the need for tailored treatment approaches based on distinct clinical subgroups. Objectives: This study aimed to identify COVID-19 patient subgroups with unique clinical characteristics using real-world data (RWD) from electronic health records (EHRs) to inform individualized treatment plans. Materials and methods: A Factor Analysis of Mixed Data (FAMD)-based agglomerative hierarchical clustering approach was employed to analyze the real-world data, enabling the identification of distinct patient subgroups. Statistical tests evaluated cluster differences, and machine learning models classified the identified subgroups. Results: Three clusters of COVID-19 in patients with unique clinical characteristics were identified. The analysis revealed significant differences in hospital stay durations and survival rates among the clusters, with more severe clinical features correlating with worse prognoses and machine learning classifiers achieving high accuracy in subgroup identification. Conclusion: By leveraging RWD and advanced clustering techniques, the study provides insights into the heterogeneity of COVID-19 presentations. The findings support the development of classification models that can inform more individualized and effective treatment plans, improving patient outcomes in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical CareAdultAgedCluster AnalysisElectronic Health RecordsFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansLength of StayMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2classificationclustering analysiscritical carefactor analysis of mixed datareal-world data

Identifiers

PMID40443932
PMCPMC12119499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.