ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2025
Enhancing the maturity of
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mechanistic study of injectable hydrogel loaded with BMSC-exosomes in regulating the TGF-β/MMP axis to inhibit experimental myopia model.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Methods and Technical Issues for Optimizing the Production of Hydrogels Containing Decellularized Wharton's Jelly.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Article
- Critical evaluation of compositions and clinical relevance of Wharton's jelly-derived biologics.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Pathology-guided design of injectable hydrogels for precision therapy and cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Starch-Gelatin-Based Scaffolds for Cartilage Defect Repair: An in vitro Study Supporting Its Potential Clinical Use.Cartilage · 2025Article
- Protein conformational transition microenvironment in silk fibroin hydrogels: proliferation and chondrogenesis of encapsulated stem cells.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The immature state of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.