Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443833›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Investigating the Efficacy of Layered Moderate Tension Reduction Suturing in Facial Aesthetic Surgery.

Gui H Wang, Jin Y Gang, Yan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gui H WangPlastic Surgery, Tongling Municipal Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Tongling, CHN.
Jin Y GangOtorhinolaryngology, Xianghe County People's Hospital, Langfang, CHN.
Yan LiOtorhinolaryngology, Shanghai Yida Hospital, Shanghai, CHN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to investigate the efficacy of the layer-by-layer moderate tension reduction suture technique in head and facial aesthetic plastic surgery.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 80 patients who underwent head and facial cosmetic and plastic surgery in the outpatient department of our hospital from April 2022 to April 2024. Among these, the experimental group received the layer-by-layer moderate tension reduction suture technique, whereas the control group received the traditional suture technique. The incidence of surgical complications, scar width, and scar quality metrics derived from the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe experimental group had a longer operation time but no complications (0%), compared to the control group's 17.5% complication rate. The χ² test confirmed the experimental group's significantly lower complication rate (P < 0.05). At one, three, six, and 12 months postoperatively, the experimental group had significantly smaller scar widths, lower POSAS scores, and lower VSS scores compared to the control group (all P < 0.05).

conclusionThe layer-by-layer moderate tension reduction suture technique demonstrated substantial advantages in head and facial aesthetic plastic surgery. It effectively minimized surgical complications, reduced scar width, and enhanced patients' scar appearance scores, making it highly worthy of clinical promotion.

Indexed as

cosmetic and plastic surgeryhead and facial regionlayer-by-layer moderate tension reduction suture techniquepatient and observer scar assessment scale (posas)scar formationvancouver scar scale (vss)

Identifiers

PMID40443833
PMCPMC12119241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.