Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443814›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of psychiatry2025

Nomophobia: Prevalence and severity among Indian medical students - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shiv K Mudgal, Pratima Gupta, Rakhi Gaur, Saurabh Varshney, Vipin Patidar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shiv K MudgalCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Pratima GuptaDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Rakhi GaurCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Saurabh VarshneyExecutive Director and CEO, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Vipin PatidarCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A growing dependence on smartphones for social interactions and learning has raised concerns about the psychological consequences of excessive usage, and nomophobia is one such concern. Aim: This review study and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prevalence and severity of nomophobia among Indian medical students. Methods: After a thorough search of the databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and EBSCO, the researchers found 77 studies. The processes of study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation were carried out by two independent reviewers. The statewise subgroups analysis was done, and heterogeneity was detected using sensitivity analysis using R programming. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024610302). Results: The analysis identified 24 studies with 7172 participants from diverse Indian states. The pooled prevalence of mild, moderate, and severe nomophobia among medical students was found to be 25% (95% CI: 21%-30%), 59% (95% CI: 54%-63%), and 14% (95% CI: 12%-17%), respectively. Subgroup analyses indicated notable differences in the severity of nomophobia, with West Bengal [84.82 (95% CI: 75.39-94.25)] and Uttarakhand [81.49 (95% CI: 78.29-84.69)] having the highest mean scores of nomophobia and Gujarat [60.00 (95% CI: 58.61-61.39)] having the lowest. Conclusion: The results show that nomophobia is prevalent among Indian medical students, underscoring the need to implement support services for individuals struggling with technology addiction such as time management and mindfulness training.

Indexed as

Medical studentsmeta-analysisnomophobiaprevalenceseverity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.