ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Cleft Lip and Palate Digital Impression Workflow.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Four-year follow-up on maxillary arch outcomes with presurgical infant orthopedics in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Development of Palatal Growth Charts for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Before Primary Single-Stage Repair.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026Article
- New Digital Workflow for the Use of a Modified Stimulating Palatal Plate in Infants with Down Syndrome.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- 'Digital impressions' for use in pediatric patients with cleft lip and palate.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2026Article
- Exploring Current Trends, Challenges and Future Directions of Intraoral Digital Impression in the Management of Patients with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Narrative Literature Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The traditional method of capturing cleft lip and palate morphology using dental impressions and plaster casts has long been considered the gold standard. However, especially for infants, digital impressions have proven to be accurate and safe. We present a protocol successfully adopted by 2 cleft centers that utilize intraoral scanners for cleft care in an outpatient setting, as well as in the operating theater. We demonstrate the positioning of the patient, scanner, monitor, and clinician, along with technical steps to capture a digital impression of the lip, nose, and cleft palate within approximately 1 minute. We also show how digital impressions can improve documentation, allow digital pretreatment, and be used for outcome comparison. The illustrated description is accompanied by a step-by-step video. Digital impressions provide enhanced 3-dimensional reconstructions of the complete cleft anatomy, which are beneficial for presurgical orthopedic planning, anatomical studies, and long-term treatment documentation. This approach minimizes risks such as airway obstruction and storage challenges encountered with physical models. Its adoption in cleft centers represents a significant advancement in cleft care, facilitating more accurate records and improving patient safety. Digital impressions can set a new standard in cleft care, improving record-taking for clinical needs and outcome analysis, and replacing traditional methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.