Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443783›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

"I Have No Idea What's in It!"-A Qualitative Study of Adolescents' Conceptions of Milk Alternatives.

Lena Szczepanski, Insa Stonner, Florian Fiebelkorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lena SzczepanskiBiology Didactics, Department of Biology/Chemistry Osnabrück University Osnabrück Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9651-8647
Insa StonnerBiology Didactics, Department of Biology/Chemistry Osnabrück University Osnabrück Germany.
Florian FiebelkornBiology Didactics, Department of Biology/Chemistry Osnabrück University Osnabrück Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze and compare adolescents' conceptions of plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs) and precision fermentation-based milk alternatives (AFM), their ingredients, and production. For this purpose, a qualitative approach with semi-structured interviews was chosen. A total of twenty-five adolescents from Germany aged between 16 and 19 years were interviewed in September and October 2022. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The results show that the adolescents in our study held simplified conceptions of the ingredients (water, oats, sugar) and production (grind oats, mix with water, and heat the liquid if necessary) of PBMAs. Their conceptions differed depending on cow's milk and PBMA consumption, with PBMA consumers having the most differentiated conceptions. Regarding AFM, the adolescents held vague conceptions and expressed their lack of familiarity with the product. They either had no concept of AFM or believed AFM to be artificial, synthetic, or laboratory milk. In conclusion, adolescents' conceptions of milk alternatives were simplified and dependent on consumption patterns, with PBMA consumers having more differentiated conceptions. Based on our findings, we suggest that nutritional education should address the ingredients and production of cow's milk and milk alternatives, as well as their advantages and disadvantages, to enable young people to make informed decisions about their consumption of milk (alternatives).

Indexed as

consumer perceptiondairy alternativesnutrition educationsustainable nutritionyoung people

Identifiers

PMID40443783
PMCPMC12121519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.