Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443743›Full record

ArticleJournal of business & economic statistics : a publication of the American Statistical Association2025

A Heteroskedasticity-Robust Overidentifying Restriction Test with High-Dimensional Covariates.

Qingliang Fan, Zijian Guo, Ziwei Mei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of business & economic statistics : a publication of the American Statistical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qingliang FanDepartment of Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Zijian GuoDepartment of Statistics, Rutgers University.
Ziwei MeiDepartment of Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Funding

Semi-supervised Approaches to Denoising Electronic Health Records Data for Risk PredictionR01LM013614 · NLM · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI CAI, TIANXI, GUO, ZIJIAN · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
Predictive Modeling with High-Dimensional lncomplete DataR01GM140463 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI GUO, ZIJIAN · 2020 to 2022
$560k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140463NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes an overidentifying restriction test for high-dimensional linear instrumental variable models. The novelty of the proposed test is that it allows the number of covariates and instruments to be larger than the sample size. The test is scale-invariant and robust to heteroskedastic errors. To construct the final test statistic, we first introduce a test based on the maximum norm of multiple parameters that could be high-dimensional. The theoretical power based on the maximum norm is higher than that in the modified Cragg-Donald test (Kolesár, 2018), the only existing test allowing for large-dimensional covariates. Second, following the principle of power enhancement (Fan et al., 2015), we introduce the power-enhanced test, with an asymptotically zero component used to enhance the power to detect some extreme alternatives with many locally invalid instruments. Finally, an empirical example of the trade and economic growth nexus demonstrates the usefulness of the proposed test.

Indexed as

data-rich environmentheteroskedasticitymaximum testoveridentification testpower enhancement

Identifiers

PMID40443743
PMCPMC12119101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.