Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443712›Full record

ArticleUncertainty for safe utilization of machine learning in medical imaging : 5th international workshop, UNSURE 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 12, 2023, proceedings. UNSURE (Workshop) (5th : 2023...2023

Dimensionality Reduction for Improving Out-of-Distribution Detection in Medical Image Segmentation.

McKell Woodland, Nihil Patel, Mais Al Taie, Joshua P Yung, Tucker J Netherton, Ankit B Patel, Kristy K Brock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Uncertainty for safe utilization of machine learning in medical imaging : 5th international workshop, UNSURE 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 12, 2023, proceedings. UNSURE (Workshop) (5th : 2023..., 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

McKell WoodlandThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0095-3695
Nihil PatelThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-8368-8512
Mais Al TaieThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-9298-6644
Joshua P YungThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3752-5997
Tucker J NethertonThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1583-7121
Ankit B PatelRice University, Houston TX 77005, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9678-496X
Kristy K BrockThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9364-5040

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Optimization and Evaluation of Anatomical Models of Liver Radiation ResponseR01CA221971 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BROCK, KRISTY · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Anatomical Modeling to Improve the Precision of Image Guided Liver AblationR01CA235564 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BROCK, KRISTY, ODISIO, BRUNO C · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA221971NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinically-deployed deep learning-based segmentation models are known to fail on data outside of their training distributions. While clinicians review the segmentations, these models do tend to perform well in most instances, which could exacerbate automation bias. Therefore, it is critical to detect out-of-distribution images at inference to warn the clinicians that the model likely failed. This work applies the Mahalanobis distance post hoc to the bottleneck features of a Swin UNETR model that segments the liver on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. By reducing the dimensions of the bottleneck features with principal component analysis, images the model failed on were detected with high performance and minimal computational load. Specifically, the proposed technique achieved 92% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and 94% area under the precision-recall curve and can run in seconds on a central processing unit.

Indexed as

Mahalanobis distanceOut-of-distribution detectionPrincipal component analysisSwin UNETR

Identifiers

PMID40443712
PMCPMC12120689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.