ReviewDiscover health systems2025
Addressing skilled birth attendants' needs of primary healthcare facilities in Nigeria using the human resources for health solutions model.
Review in Discover health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the needs of skilled birth attendants (SBAs) of primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in Nigeria using the human resources for health (HRH) solutions model. A model analysis approach was adopted to understand existing frameworks in the global HRH landscape. An initial framework identification and contextualization were conducted to guide the analysis of the models identified in the literature. Relevant frameworks were identified, reviewed, and consolidated using the WHO HRH Action Framework (HAF). A total of 109 articles were included in the study after thorough screening out of which only nine (9) models of improving HRH planning and implementation in global health were reviewed. These were the Task Shifting/Sharing Model, Community Midwifery Model (CMM), Performance-Based Financing Model (PBF), Needs-Based Planning Model, Facilities-Based HRH Planning Model, Utilization-Based HRH Planning Model, Workforce Indicator Staffing Needs Model, USAID-Financing Innovations for Nutrition (FINFI) Model, and Micro-Learning Model. The proposed HRH solution model was adapted based on the gaps identified in all analyzed models. This study showed that there are different HRH models which address specific elements of the HRH value chain. However, these models are not comprehensive, therefore, tackling the challenges of SBA shortage in Nigeria would either require the integration of multiple models or the deployment of models in a phased approach which is what informed the proposed HRH solution model in addressing SBAs' needs of PHCs in Nigeria. We therefore recommend the implementation of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.