ReviewCureus2025
Perioperative Advances in Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Narrative Review of Strategies to Enhance Outcomes and Reduce Complications.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Global Burden of Aortic Aneurysm and Its Attributable Risk Factors, 1990-2021: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Mortality trends and disparities associated with aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection in the United States from 1999 to 2023: a CDC WONDER database analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite ongoing advancements in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, perioperative complications remain a major concern. This narrative review offers a novel analysis of emerging perioperative strategies, uniquely integrating recent guideline updates with evolving innovations such as AI-driven risk models, frailty and sarcopenia assessment, and personalized hemodynamic management. Unlike previous reviews, this article bridges evidence-based practices with real-world implementation challenges, highlighting barriers to guideline adherence, especially in low-resource settings. The review evaluates the latest developments in anesthetic approaches, fluid and transfusion protocols, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs, and infection control measures, with a strong emphasis on tailored pathways for both open surgical repair (OPS) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Long-term surveillance protocols and antimicrobial graft technologies are explored as key future directions. By connecting recent literature with practical, patient-centered applications, this work provides a forward-looking roadmap for optimizing AAA care across diverse clinical environments. Its novelty lies in presenting a comprehensive, multidisciplinary framework that incorporates precision medicine and implementation science to advance perioperative vascular surgery outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.