Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443588›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Structure of Trials Assessing Endovascular Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Scoping Review.

Andrew Bohner, Humza Qureshi, Sachin Mysore, Arjun Kumar, Manisha Koneru

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew BohnerNeurosciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, USA.
Humza QureshiNeurosciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, USA.
Sachin MysoreNeurosciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, USA.
Arjun KumarNeurosciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, USA.
Manisha KoneruNeurointerventional Surgery, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in embolic agents and endovascular techniques have led to increased interest in exploring endovascular embolization as a viable treatment for brain arteriovenous malformations. Several trials have investigated the use of various embolic agents for the treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) endovascularly. However, the reporting outcomes and design elements in these studies are heterogeneous and include inclusion/exclusion criteria and evaluated endpoints. This scoping review synthesized common endpoints cited within embolic endovascular AVM trials for monitoring their safety and efficacy, with a commentary on common threads of focus in future trials for evaluating AVM treatment, including adapting designs to be on par with the pace of advancements in endovascular technologies.

Indexed as

cerebral arteriovenous malformationsclinical trialsdata collectionembolizationresearch design

Identifiers

PMID40443588
PMCPMC12121930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.