ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
A network analysis of timing and conditions present at time of death for periviable infants (22+0-23+6 weeks) admitted to neonatal intensive care after receiving survival-focused care at birth.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Advances in neonatal care have resulted in improved survival rates for periviable infants (22 + 0-23 + 6 weeks) with increasing numbers being admitted to neonatal intensive care units across the United Kingdom. Qualitative research evidences the conflict perinatal professionals experience traversing the line between providing life-sustaining treatment to these infants, whilst not wanting to inflict a prolonged period of suffering to infants who will ultimately die. Professionals currently lack adequate prognostic tools to accurately predict pre-birth which infants will survive. Methods: This study utilises an anonymised dataset from the North West Neonatal Network to delineate time of death profiles for periviable infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and explores the demographics, timing and diagnoses recorded at the time of the death. Results: The data show that most periviable infants who died following admission to NICU died within the first seven days after birth [24 infants born at 22 weeks (65%) and 55 infants born at 23 weeks (52%)]. For infants born at 22 weeks who subsequently died on NICU, 89% had died within 14 days after birth. Reorientation of care was recorded as a relevant factor at the time of death in a minority of patients [23 infants (16%)]. Discussion: Where active, survival-focused care has been initiated, the response of the infant to intensive care and the likelihood of their survival emerges over a relatively short timeframe after admission. This lends support to a trial of therapy approach for suitable periviable infants balancing the need to avoid iatrogenic harm to infants who will ultimately die despite intensive care, whilst not denying them the chance at survival. Management of periviable deliveries requires coordinated parallel planning and a high-quality palliative care approach throughout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.