ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
MRI-based artificial intelligence models for post-neoadjuvant surgery personalization in breast cancer: a narrative review of evidence from Western Pacific.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Practical Machine Learning Model for Predicting Neoadjuvant Response in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Leveraging Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnostics Imaging: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Recent advances in breast cancer screening and treatment in the Western Pacific: challenges and opportunities.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging method for diagnosing breast cancer and assessing treatment response. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics offer new opportunities to identify patterns in imaging data, supporting personalized post-neoadjuvant surgical decisions. This paper reviewed breast MRI-based AI models for predicting outcomes after neoadjuvant therapy, with a focus on evidence from the Western Pacific region, to evaluate the quality of existing models, discuss their inherent limitations, and outline potential future directions. A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science identified 51 relevant studies in the region, with the majority conducted in China, followed by South Korea and Japan. Most studies focused on predicting pathologic complete response (pCR), with a median sample size of 152 and largely retrospective single-center designs. Model performance was commonly assessed using validation sets, with pooled sensitivity and specificity for pCR prediction showing promising results. Models incorporating multitemporal MRI features were associated with improved accuracy. While MRI-based AI models show potential for guiding surgical planning, improved methodological quality and algorithmic explainability are needed to facilitate clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.