ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Impact of rigid cardiac motion on the accuracy of electrocardiographic imaging.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review of the Forward Problem in Electrocardiographic Imaging.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI) offers a non-invasive approach to reconstruct cardiac electrical activity. However, the inverse problem of ECGI is highly ill-conditioned, making it sensitive to errors. In practice, rigid displacements of the heart during beating introduce geometric errors into the ECGI problem. This study aims to investigate the impact of cardiac rigid motion on the accuracy of ECGI. Methods: We employed the Boundary Element Method (BEM) to solve the forward problem and the Tikhonov method to address the inverse problem. We utilized a dataset from the CRVTI/SCI Institute, which involves Langendorff-perfused dog hearts suspended in a torso-shaped tank. Based on clinical experience, six different types of cardiac movement patterns, including translations and rotations, were designed to assess the impact of various displacements on the accuracy of the ECGI solution. Results: Our study found that among the translational and rotational movements of the heart, rotational motion should be prioritized for attention, as it caused significantly stronger changes in ECGI correlation coefficient (CC) and relative error (RE) than translational motion. Among the translations along the coordinate axes, movement along the y-axis (anterior-posterior movement within the chest cavity) had the least impact. For rotational movements, rolling had the least impact, yaw had moderate impact, and pitch had the greatest impact. Conclusion: The inverse solution of ECGI demonstrates a certain robustness to changes in heart position, with CC changes of less than 2% for 10 mm displacements and less than 5% for 10° rotations. This suggests that ECGI changes due to cardiac geometric motion can be disregarded within a certain range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.