ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Combined multi-omics and physiological approaches to elucidate drought-response mechanisms of durum wheat.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stress-tolerance genes in rice: bridging gene discovery, functional validation, and breeding applications.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- A coordinated network of ABA signaling, photorespiratory and proteostasis in EMS-induced maize mutant with enhanced drought resistance.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Durum wheat is the most important cereal in the Mediterranean regions, where drought negatively affects grain yield. Therefore, our objective was to perform a multi-omics and integration analysis in conjunction with physiological trials to improve our understanding of drought tolerance mechanisms of durum wheat. Methods: Genome-wide association study (GWAS) for yield components was performed on a panel of 225 elite durum wheat genotypes evaluated in eight sites under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Based on physiological parameters (net photosynthesis, intracellular CO2 content, transpiration and stomatal conductance) and grain yield, contrasting genotypes (susceptible and tolerant) to drought were identified. A transcriptomic (RNA-seq), metabolomic and integration analyses were performed to identify genes and metabolites associated with tolerance in durum wheat. Results: Nine marker-trait associations were detected across 8 environments, and they were grouped into three QTL clusters (QTL_2A_TGW/GPS.1, QTL_2A_TGW/GPS.2, and QTL_2B_TGW/GPS.1), explaining between 5.15% and 14.29% of the phenotypic variation. One drought tolerant (QUC 3678-2016) and one susceptible (BRESCIA) genotype were identified based on physiological parameters. RNA-seq analysis showed that the genes regulated were mainly enriched in processes such as response to salicylic acid, plant organ senescence, synthesis of secondary metabolites, and immune response. Metabolic analysis showed that drought increased the contents of amino acids, sugars, and organic acids. The integration analysis identified 30 genes and six metabolites in the root and 30 genes and 10 metabolites in leaves as the primary variables in the drought-tolerant genotype, in which L-Proline was an important metabolite that allowed differentiating those two contrasting genotypes. A WRKY transcription factor was also positioned on the stable QTL QTN_2A_TGW/GPS.1 associated with the GENE-1342_238 SNP marker. Discussion: These results open an opportunity to use new biomarkers in durum wheat breeding programs to develop resilient and high-yielding cultivars and ensure food security under water deficit conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.