Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443389›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

The stepwise rise of angiosperm-dominated terrestrial ecosystems.

Wenna Ding, Daniele Silvestro, Renske E Onstein, Mengxiao Wu, Zhekun Zhou, Yaowu Xing

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenna DingState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, 666303, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0446-8431
Daniele SilvestroDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Renske E OnsteinNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwinweg 2, Leiden, 2333CR, the Netherlands.
Mengxiao WuState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, 666303, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2277-2661
Zhekun ZhouState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, 666303, China.
Yaowu XingState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, 666303, China.

Funding

14th Five-Year Plan of the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences XTBG -1450101National Natural Science Foundation of China 32170212National Natural Science Foundation of China 32225005Swedish Research Council VR: 2024-04303the German Research Foundation 202548816the German Research Foundation DFG FZT118the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST YESS2021QNRC001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiosperms are the most diverse and abundant plant taxon today and dominate the majority of Earth's terrestrial ecosystems. They underwent rapid divergence and biogeographic expansion from the early to the middle Cretaceous. Yet, transformative ecosystem change brought about by the increased ecological dominance of angiosperms unfolded progressively until the Late Cretaceous. After the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary, angiosperms restructured terrestrial ecosystems towards a modern form. By the Neogene, crown groups that make up modern terrestrial angiosperm biodiversity radiated, and regional floristic distinctions were established concurrently with the steepened latitudinal and vertical temperature gradients. Here, we summarize, based on fossils and molecular evidence, when and how angiosperms came to diversify, dominate, and shape terrestrial ecosystems, leading to the emergence and spread of angiosperm-dominated floras. We highlight five major phases of angiosperm evolution that took place against a background of palaeogeography and climate changes. There is a consistent delay in ecological dominance after lineage origination and taxonomic diversification, as a result of which angiosperms did not achieve ecological dominance across terrestrial biomes in a single step. The patterns of diversity seen among extant angiosperms, the dominant angiosperm groups within modern ecosystems, and the restriction of different groups of angiosperms to different parts of the world, reflect the contingent nature of the process of lineage diversification in the context of long-term, substantial and ongoing environmental change. Determining the origins, diversification, and ecological dominance of angiosperms continues to be a challenge and requires elucidation of their early forms, functions, habitats, and environmental interactions throughout evolutionary history.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEcosystemMagnoliopsidaBiodiversityFossilsangiosperm‐dominated biomeecological dominancefloristic turnoverflowering plantslatitudinal biodiversitymodernizationterrestrial ecosystems

Identifiers

PMID40443389
PMCPMC12407066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.