ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025
The stepwise rise of angiosperm-dominated terrestrial ecosystems.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macroevolutionary dynamics and predictors of tropical rain forest plant diversity.Science advances · 2026Article
- A new Cretaceous family illuminates the early evolutionary history of True Sawflies (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinoidea).Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society · 2026Article
- An almost fully resolved phylogeny for the Dutch Angiosperm Flora.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- Functional saturation of Earth's habitable domains: constraints on land systems and potential in marine environments.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- The asynchronous rise of Northern Hemisphere alpine floras reveals general responses of biotic assembly to orogeny and climate change.Science advances · 2025Article
- Population Genetic Differentiation and Evolutionary History inEcology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Angiosperms are the most diverse and abundant plant taxon today and dominate the majority of Earth's terrestrial ecosystems. They underwent rapid divergence and biogeographic expansion from the early to the middle Cretaceous. Yet, transformative ecosystem change brought about by the increased ecological dominance of angiosperms unfolded progressively until the Late Cretaceous. After the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary, angiosperms restructured terrestrial ecosystems towards a modern form. By the Neogene, crown groups that make up modern terrestrial angiosperm biodiversity radiated, and regional floristic distinctions were established concurrently with the steepened latitudinal and vertical temperature gradients. Here, we summarize, based on fossils and molecular evidence, when and how angiosperms came to diversify, dominate, and shape terrestrial ecosystems, leading to the emergence and spread of angiosperm-dominated floras. We highlight five major phases of angiosperm evolution that took place against a background of palaeogeography and climate changes. There is a consistent delay in ecological dominance after lineage origination and taxonomic diversification, as a result of which angiosperms did not achieve ecological dominance across terrestrial biomes in a single step. The patterns of diversity seen among extant angiosperms, the dominant angiosperm groups within modern ecosystems, and the restriction of different groups of angiosperms to different parts of the world, reflect the contingent nature of the process of lineage diversification in the context of long-term, substantial and ongoing environmental change. Determining the origins, diversification, and ecological dominance of angiosperms continues to be a challenge and requires elucidation of their early forms, functions, habitats, and environmental interactions throughout evolutionary history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.