ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2025
Retrospective Study Evaluating Outcomes Following Palliative Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy for Dogs With Presumed Cardiac Hemangiosarcoma.
Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrospective Study Evaluating Outcomes Following Palliative Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy for Dogs With Presumed Cardiac Hemangiosarcoma.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canine cardiac hemangiosarcoma (cHSA) represents a complex clinical challenge in that those afflicted have an acute risk of death due to cardiac tamponade and high morbidity and mortality given the frequency of metastasis. Previous studies show that radiation therapy (RT) can decrease the risk of tamponade; however, an optimal approach has yet to be determined. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of dogs with presumptive cHSA treated with varied RT protocols and modalities, and to contrast findings with previously published literature. Secondary objectives were to assess differences in outcomes between those that received chemotherapy post-RT or did not, single fraction versus multiple-fraction RT protocols, and CT-guided versus manually calculated treatment plans. Twenty-seven dogs with echocardiographic evidence of an atrial or auricular cardiac mass that received RT were included. The frequency of pericardiocentesis before and post-RT were compared. Overall survival time was determined, along with survival time specific to those that received chemotherapy, were treated with CT-based radiation plans, and were prescribed a single fraction versus multiple fractions. Pericardiocentesis was performed an average of 1.1 times per week before RT, and an average of 0.18 times per week after RT (p = 0.01). Median overall survival time was 137 days. Plans made without CT guidance were associated with more adverse radiation events, but all were minimally impactful on quality of life. Most dogs died or were euthanized due to metastatic disease. This study shows similar benefits to previously published data in a larger cohort of dogs using a less-conformal radiation modality. As well, it highlights future directions to identify optimal systemic therapies to delay the onset of metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.