Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443024›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025

Startling acoustic stimuli hasten reflexive choice reaching tasks by enhancing, but not changing the timing of, express visuomotor responses.

Vivian Weerdesteyn, Sarah L Kearsley, Aaron L Cecala, Ewan A Macpherson, Brian D Corneil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. What Is the StartReact Effect?Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vivian WeerdesteynDepartment of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Sarah L KearsleyGraduate Program in Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Aaron L CecalaDepartment of Physiology & Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ewan A MacphersonSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Brian D CorneilDepartment of Physiology & Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4702-7089

Funding

Canadian Government | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) 04394-2021Canadian Government | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) 311680Erasmus+ Staff Mobility GrantMitacs and Parkinson Society of Southwestern Ontario ScholarshipNetherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Vidi 91717369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responding to an external stimulus takes ∼200 ms, but this can be shortened to as little as ∼120 ms with the additional presentation of a startling acoustic stimulus. This phenomenon is hypothesized to arise from the involuntary release of a prepared movement (a StartReact effect). However, a startling acoustic stimulus also expedites rapid mid-flight, reactive adjustments to unpredictably displaced targets which could not have been prepared in advance. We surmise that for such rapid visuomotor transformations, intersensory facilitation may occur between auditory signals arising from the startling acoustic stimulus and visual signals relayed along a fast subcortical network. To explore this, we examined how a startling acoustic stimulus shortens reaction times in a task that produces express visuomotor responses, which are brief bursts of muscle activity that arise from a fast tectoreticulospinal network. We measured express visuomotor responses on upper limb muscles in humans as they reached either toward or away from a stimulus in blocks of trials where movements could either be fully prepared or not, occasionally pairing stimulus presentation with a startling acoustic stimulus. The startling acoustic stimulus reliably produced larger but fixed-latency express visuomotor responses in a target-selective manner, and also shortened reaction times, which were equally short for prepared and unprepared movements. Our results provide insights into how a startling acoustic stimulus shortens the latency of reactive movements without full motor preparation. We propose that the reticular formation is the probable node for intersensory convergence during the most rapid transformations of vision into targeted reaching actions. KEY POINTS: A startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) shortens reaction times by releasing fully prepared motor programmes (the StartReact effect), but can also hasten responses in reflexive tasks without any movement preparation. Here we measure the effect of a SAS on reaction times and upper limb muscle recruitment in a reflexive reaching task, focusing on express visuomotor responses that are evoked by visual target presentation and demarcate activity along a subcortical tectoreticulospinal pathway. A SAS robustly increased the magnitude of express visuomotor responses without changing their timing, and this increase was tightly related to the subsequent reaction time even in the absence of motor preparation. Our results attest to intersensory facilitation within the tectoreticulospinal pathway, which provides the shortest pathway mediating visuomotor transformations for reaching. These results reconcile discrepant findings by emphasizing the importance of intersensory facilitation in SAS-induced hastening of reaction times in reflexive tasks.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorPsychomotor PerformanceAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalReaction TimeYoung Adultacoustic startleEMGreachingreaction time

Identifiers

PMID40443024
PMCPMC12148209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.