Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443021›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Bacillus licheniformis 809 and Bacillus subtilis 810 promote in vitro supportive effects against potentially harmful microorganisms under a feed matrix-based assay.

Lena C Capern, Raphaele Gresse, Oscar C M Queiroz, Bruno I Cappellozza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of feeding aTranslational animal science · 2026
    Article
  4. A retrospective evaluation on the effects of aTranslational animal science · 2026
    Article
  5. Effects of supplementing aTranslational animal science · 2026
    Article
  6. Maternal supplementation withTranslational animal science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lena C CapernNovonesis, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Raphaele GresseNovonesis, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Oscar C M QueirozNovonesis, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Bruno I CappellozzaNovonesis, Hørsholm, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1819-4013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a series of in vitro studies to assess the effects of Bacillus licheniformis 809 (BL) and B. subtilis 810 (BS) on the growth of potentially harmful bacteria. The BL and BS as single strains (experiment 1) or a 1:1 ratio combination of BL and BS (experiment 2) were inoculated in treatment samples to an estimated concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/g of cattle feed. The strains of E. coli and S. enterica were inoculated and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 18 to 24 h, whereas C. jejuni was incubated microaerophilic at 42 °C for 18 to 24 h. After 18 h incubation of the feed samples, each individual pathogenic strain was inoculated to a rate of 1 × 105 CFU for E. coli and S. enterica and 1 × 106 CFU/g feed for C. jejuni, respectively. Immediately after incubating all feed samples aerobically at 37 °C, 120 rpm vortex for 24 h for E. coli and S. enterica or microaerophilic at 42 °C, no vortex for 32 to 36 h for C. jejuni. Aliquots from all feed samples containing E. coli and S. enterica were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h and for C. jejuni incubated microaerophilic 42 °C for 24 h before pathogen enumeration and CFU/g feed calculation. In the first assay, BL significantly reduced the C. jejuni counts at 8, 24, and 36 h (P < 0.001). Similarly, a treatment × hour interaction was also observed (P < 0.001) on the E. coli O149:F4 and O138:F18 counts. For both E. coli, BL and BS reduced the counts of E. coli vs. CON at 4 and 8 h post-DFM addition (P < 0.001) compared to CON, but no differences were observed at 24 h (P ≥ 0.27). Moreover, BL inoculation yielded less E. coli O149:F4 counts when compared to BS at 8 h (P = 0.02), but also at 4 and 8 h when E. coli O138:F18 was evaluated (P ≤ 0.04). For S. enterica Enteritidis, counts were less in BL + BS at 4, 8, and 24 h vs. CON (P ≤ 0.001). Similarly, C. jejuni counts were less for BL + BS at 24 and 32 h (P ≤ 0.0001). Lastly, the counts of E. coli O149:F4 and O138:F18 were less (P < 0.0001) at 6 and 24 h for BL + BS vs. CON. In summary, Bacillus licheniformis 809 and B. subtilis 810, alone or in combination, reduced the in vitro counts of potentially harmful bacteria. Additional work is warranted to evaluate if such responses may be replicated under in vivo challenge models.

Indexed as

Animal FeedBacillus licheniformisBacillus subtilisProbioticsAnimalsCampylobacter jejuniCattleEscherichia coliFood MicrobiologyBacillus sppdirect-fed microbialin vitropotentially harmful bacteria

Identifiers

PMID40443021
PMCPMC12288027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.