Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40443000›Full record

ReviewJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2025

Evolution of the Military Health System compounded drugs utilization and management.

Teisha Robertson, Jessica Wong-Flores, Thomas Scott Raisor, Leighcraft Shakes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Teisha RobertsonDefense Health Agency, Falls Church, VA.
Jessica Wong-FloresDefense Health Agency, Bethesda, MD.
Thomas Scott RaisorPharmacy Operations Division Formulary Management Branch, Defense Health Agency, San Antonio, TX.
Leighcraft ShakesDefense Health Agency, Falls Church, VA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, the TRICARE pharmacy benefit has undergone significant changes, particularly in the management and utilization of compound drugs. Compound drugs are customized formulations that combine 2 or more pharmaceutical ingredients to meet specific patient needs and can offer therapeutic alternatives when standard US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications are ineffective. However, concerns regarding the safety, clinical effectiveness, and rising costs have necessitated increased oversight. Between 2013 and 2015, TRICARE experienced a drastic surge in compound drug expenditures, escalating from 4% of total pharmacy outpatient drug costs to 13% (more than $1.6 billion), despite representing only 0.4% of total outpatient prescription volume. This rapid increase highlighted the need for stricter controls to manage spending and ensure appropriate utilization. In response, the Defense Health Agency implemented a compound drug screening process in 2015, applying utilization management tools such as quantity limits, prior authorization, and step therapy. These measures aim to balance cost containment with maintaining access to clinically necessary compounded medications. This article provides a comprehensive review of the evolution of compound drugs within the TRICARE pharmacy benefit, examining safety concerns, spending trends, and management strategies.

Indexed as

Drug CompoundingInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesMilitary Health ServicesCost ControlDrug CostsHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40443000
PMCPMC12123196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.