ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
BCR::ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors During Pregnancy, a Disproportionality Analysis of Vigibase.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Maternal and Neonatal Complications Associated with Breast Cancer Systemic Treatments-A VigiBase Disproportionality Analysis Study.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Leukemia during pregnancy and survivorship: gestational age-stratified multidisciplinary management framework.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Cancer in Pregnancy: Therapeutic Decisions at the Intersection of Two Lives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting BCR::ABL1 have greatly improved the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and their teratogenicity appears as an important factor for individuals of childbearing potential. This study aims to investigate pregnancy and fetal/newborn adverse outcomes resulting from exposure to BCR::ABL1-TKIs during pregnancy. For this disproportionality analysis, we used the WHO's global VigiBase up to January 2024, and included reports involving pregnancy, antineoplastic treatment during pregnancy, and cancer. The exposure group consisted of reports mentioning BCR::ABL1-TKIs at any time during pregnancy. The primary outcome was the reporting odds ratio (ROR) of maternal-fetal complications in the BCR::ABL1-TKIs group compared to other anticancer treatments. The analysis included 3,389 reports (TKI = 969; other = 2,420). In the BCR::ABL1-TKI-exposed group, the mean age was 28.9 years, and 724 patients (92.2%) were treated for CML. BCR::ABL1-TKIs were mainly imatinib (n = 642, 66.3%), nilotinib (n = 218, 22.5%), and dasatinib (n = 127, 13.1%) reported without other non-TKI anticancer agents(92.3%). Compared to other anticancer drugs, overreported outcomes with TKIs included hydrops fetalis (ROR = 13 [95%CI = 1.5-110], P = 0.009), polyhydramnios (ROR = 5 [1.3-20], P = 0.02), and threatened preterm labor (ROR = 10 [1.1-90], P = 0.03). When analyzing specific molecule effects, hydrops fetalis (ROR = 27 [5.4-130], P = 0.001) and polyhydramnios (ROR = 13 [3.3-54], P = 0.004) were overreported with dasatinib. In this large cohort of 969 individuals exposed to TKIs during pregnancy, dasatinib use was associated with most BCR::ABL1-TKI-specific toxicities and should be avoided during pregnancy. Fewer or no adverse events were overreported with imatinib and nilotinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.