Trial reportJournal of ovarian research2025
Comparative study of cabergoline and hydroxychloroquine to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in PCOS patients: a pilot randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study compared the effectiveness of cabergoline and hydroxychloroquine in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis double-blind, parallel, and randomized clinical trial was performed from April to June 2024. Forty-two patients with PCOS who were candidates for assisted reproductive techniques were randomized into two groups. The first group received 0.5 mg of cabergoline, and the second group received 400 mg of hydroxychloroquine for 8 days. Then, ultrasounds were conducted on days 3 and 5 after oocyte retrieval to assess for OHSS.
resultsThree and five days after oocyte retrieval, laboratory findings, and clinical outcomes were similar between the cabergoline and hydroxychloroquine groups. Key laboratory parameters, including hemoglobin, hematocrit, sodium, potassium, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine, did not show significant differences between the groups. On day three, OHSS incidence didn't have a significant difference between the hydroxychloroquine and cabergoline groups, both for the mild (31.58% vs. 42.86%) and moderate (15.79% vs. 9.52%) groups. Mild cases were observed in one of the patients in both groups 5 days after pickup (p = 0.942). No patients in the cabergoline group required hospitalization or treatment, compared to one in the hydroxychloroquine group (p = 0.127).
conclusionThe incidence of OHSS was similar between cabergoline and hydroxychloroquine, with no significant differences observed in laboratory parameters or clinical outcomes after oocyte retrieval. However, given the study's sample size, further research is needed before these findings can be generalized to a larger population. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: http://www.irct.ir ; Registration number: IRCT20240305061171N1; Registration date: 2024 June 29.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.