Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442811›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2025

Enhancing systemic lupus erythematosus treatment outcomes with an early initiation of belimumab: insights from a multicenter retrospective study within the first five years.

Kanako Kojima, Kunihiro Ichinose, Masataka Umeda, Toshimasa Shimizu, Shuntaro Sato, Takahisa Suzuki, Yoshikazu Nakashima, Akitomo Okada, Yoshiro Horai, Keita Fujikawa and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Anti-CD19-engineered exosomes enable B cell-targeted anti-BAFF mRNA delivery to alleviate lupus progression.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. [Lupus erythematosus].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kanako KojimaDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Kunihiro IchinoseDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan. kichinose@med.shimane-u.ac.jp.
Masataka UmedaDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan. masatakau0807@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.
Toshimasa ShimizuDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Shuntaro SatoClinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Takahisa SuzukiJapanese Red Cross Nagasaki Genbaku Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yoshikazu NakashimaNagasaki Kita Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Akitomo OkadaNational Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, Omura, Japan.
Yoshiro HoraiSasebo City General Hospital, Sasebo, Japan.
Keita FujikawaJapan Community Healthcare Organization, Isahaya General Hospital, Isahaya, Japan.
Toshiyuki AramakiSasebo Chuo Hospital, Sasebo, Japan.
Taiichiro MiyashitaMiyashita Rheumatology Clinic, Omura, Japan.
Masako FuruyamaNagasaki Kita Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Naoki MatsuokaNagasaki Medical Hospital of Rheumatology, Nagasaki, Japan.
Atsushi KawakamiDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K20905Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K07895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe human monoclonal antibody belimumab (BEL) has emerged as a promising treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly for reducing the need for glucocorticoids and minimizing organ damage. The optimal timing of BEL initiation has been unclear; emerging evidence suggests that early intervention with BEL, particularly within the first 5 years of diagnosis, may yield better outcomes by modulating disease progression and reducing flare frequency. Understanding the relationship between disease duration and BEL efficacy is essential for the development of tailored strategies. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analyzed patients with SLE treated at our hospital and associated facilities who were diagnosed according to the 1997 ACR or 2012 SLICC criteria and who began BEL treatment between December 2017 and August 2021. Patients who were followed for ≥ 12 months after BEL initiation were included. We investigated the changes in the patients' Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) scores at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the introduction of BEL, comparing patients with disease durations ≤ 5 years to those with > 5 years. A mixed-effects model was adjusted for the patients' ages, prednisolone dosages, initial SELENA-SLEDAI scores, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) damage index (SDI), hydroxychloroquine use, and lupus nephritis. Clinical manifestations including arthritis, skin lesions, and hematological abnormalities were monitored to assess the broader impacts of BEL.

resultsOne hundred eleven patients were initially registered; among them, 97 patients were included in the final analysis. The study population (mean age, 41 years; mean SELENA-SLEDAI, 7 points; 51% using hydroxychloroquine) included 19 patients with a ≤ 5-year SLE duration and 78 with SLE durations > 5 years. The baseline SELENA-SLEDAI scores were higher in the ≤ 5-year group (p = 0.047), indicating more active disease. Patients with ≤ 5 years of disease had significantly greater improvements in SELENA-SLEDAI scores at 6, 9, and 12 months (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThese results highlight the importance of early BEL initiation in SLE, demonstrating that patients with shorter disease durations achieve more substantial improvements in disease activity with early BEL treatment. Our findings also reveal the potential benefits of early BEL intervention and suggest that incorporating the disease duration into treatment decisions may optimize patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunosuppressive AgentsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicAdultDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbelimumabImmunosuppressive AgentsB cell therapyBelimumabDisease durationEarly interventionSELENA-SLEDAISystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID40442811
PMCPMC12121007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.