ArticleArthritis research & therapy2025
Enhancing systemic lupus erythematosus treatment outcomes with an early initiation of belimumab: insights from a multicenter retrospective study within the first five years.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of belimumab on the utility of serological markers for assessing systemic lupus erythematosus activity.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Anti-CD19-engineered exosomes enable B cell-targeted anti-BAFF mRNA delivery to alleviate lupus progression.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Article
- Timing of treatment-switch to telitacicept in high-risk IgA nephropathy: an observational case series of two clinical scenarios.BMC nephrology · 2026Observational
- Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematodes.Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 2026Article
- [Lupus erythematosus].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe human monoclonal antibody belimumab (BEL) has emerged as a promising treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly for reducing the need for glucocorticoids and minimizing organ damage. The optimal timing of BEL initiation has been unclear; emerging evidence suggests that early intervention with BEL, particularly within the first 5 years of diagnosis, may yield better outcomes by modulating disease progression and reducing flare frequency. Understanding the relationship between disease duration and BEL efficacy is essential for the development of tailored strategies. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe analyzed patients with SLE treated at our hospital and associated facilities who were diagnosed according to the 1997 ACR or 2012 SLICC criteria and who began BEL treatment between December 2017 and August 2021. Patients who were followed for ≥ 12 months after BEL initiation were included. We investigated the changes in the patients' Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) scores at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the introduction of BEL, comparing patients with disease durations ≤ 5 years to those with > 5 years. A mixed-effects model was adjusted for the patients' ages, prednisolone dosages, initial SELENA-SLEDAI scores, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) damage index (SDI), hydroxychloroquine use, and lupus nephritis. Clinical manifestations including arthritis, skin lesions, and hematological abnormalities were monitored to assess the broader impacts of BEL.
resultsOne hundred eleven patients were initially registered; among them, 97 patients were included in the final analysis. The study population (mean age, 41 years; mean SELENA-SLEDAI, 7 points; 51% using hydroxychloroquine) included 19 patients with a ≤ 5-year SLE duration and 78 with SLE durations > 5 years. The baseline SELENA-SLEDAI scores were higher in the ≤ 5-year group (p = 0.047), indicating more active disease. Patients with ≤ 5 years of disease had significantly greater improvements in SELENA-SLEDAI scores at 6, 9, and 12 months (p < 0.05).
conclusionsThese results highlight the importance of early BEL initiation in SLE, demonstrating that patients with shorter disease durations achieve more substantial improvements in disease activity with early BEL treatment. Our findings also reveal the potential benefits of early BEL intervention and suggest that incorporating the disease duration into treatment decisions may optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.