ArticleBMC medical education2025
Lost in transition: from medical student to clinical supervisor - a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting nurses' adherence to chemical decontamination procedures: a transtheoretical model SEM analysis.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Knowing Me Knowing You-Mentorship in Hospital Placement.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJunior doctors play an essential role in clinical education. The transition from medical student to junior doctor involves assuming a new role as a clinical supervisor, but the preparation for this assignment is minimal and research on what the transition entails is scarce. Our study aims to explore the experiences and challenges that junior doctors face as clinical supervisors.
methodsAn exploratory sequential mixed methods design, qualitative method first, was adopted. Qualitative data was collected through semi-structured individual interviews with junior doctors. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to generate themes. Quantitative data was collected through a survey related to affections, challenges, and organizational aspects of supervision. The survey included the Positive and Negative Affects Schedule (PANAS) and self-constructed items and was analysed by calculating percentages. All data was subsequently merged and interpreted as a whole.
resultsTen junior doctors were interviewed and 89 (41%) junior doctors at two different hospitals responded to the survey. Four overarching themes were developed to describe junior doctors' experiences as clinical supervisors: T1) Learning to teach: Personal construct shaping supervisor development, T2) Learning through teaching: Dual growth from near-peer supervision, T3) Teaching while learning: Challenges and strategies of supervising as a novice, T4) Missing the manual: Organizational constrictions for efficient supervision. The main factor contributing to junior doctors' development as supervisors was their own experiences as students (T1). Engaging in clinical supervision was rewarding for junior doctors' learning, as it confirmed their progress in knowledge and skills and helped identify knowledge gaps (T2). However, supervising without medical expertise, formal pedagogical training, and familiarity with the clinic was a major challenge (T3). Providing effective supervision while maintaining a sustainable work-life was hindered by insufficient organizational support, and only 15% of junior doctors felt prepared to supervise (T4).
conclusionsEngaging in clinical supervision as a junior doctor can foster growth as a clinician and teacher, however, it may further increase the cognitive load that you already experience as a novice. This study highlights the affective, pedagogical, and organizational support that junior doctors need to develop as teachers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.