ArticleJournal of ovarian research2025
Embryo utilisation rate and transferable embryo to oocyte ratio correlate positively with livebirth rate but negatively with oocyte number: analysis of 14,156 fresh IVF/ICSI cycles.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reevaluating statistical methods for proportion-based laboratory outcomes in assisted reproduction.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- The Association Between Mature Oocyte Proportion and IVF Success: A Retrospective Analysis of 2,565 ICSI Cycles.Journal of reproduction & infertility · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe live birth rates (LBRs) do not rise after a certain number of oocytes are collected in fresh IVF cycles. Although the detrimental effect of high ovarian response on the endometrium has been recognised, the effect of high oocyte yield on oocyte competency remains disputed. The purpose of this study was to examine whether high oocyte yield adversely affect the competency of oocytes or embryos. We retrospectively analysed UK's National database (published by Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA)- year 2015-2016) including couples who underwent first IVF treatment with single embryo transfer or had no available embryo, due to tubal or unexplained infertility among women aged < 40 years.
resultsRetrospective analysis of 14,156 fresh IVF/ ICSI cycles that met the inclusion criteria revealed an inverse correlation between Embryo Utilisation Rate (EUR) and the oocyte yield (r= -0.250047, p < 0.0001). The Transferable Embryo to Oocyte Ratio (TEOR) also inversely correlated with the number of retrieved oocyte (r = - 0.331431, p < 0.0001). The number of oocytes that did not produce transferable embryos had a stronger positive correlation with oocyte yield (r = 0.916676, p < 0.0001) than those produced transferable embryos (r = 0.569972, p < 0.0001). Both EUR (p = 0.01) and TEOR (P < 0.0001) correlated positively with the live birth except in the women age-group of 38-39 years. Although fertilisation rates remained similar, both EUR and TEOR declined steadily with the increasing number of oocytes until it reached a nadir at around 8-9 oocytes. At this point the LBR in fresh cycles reached its peak.
conclusionThe EUR and TEOR decline with increasing oocyte yield while both the ratios have a positive correlation with live birth. Despite declining EUR and TEOR, increasing oocyte yield can still boost fresh cycle LBR until the proportions of transferable embryos fall to a nadir. Thus, the focus needs to be on finding more efficient method for embryo selection and avoid generating too many wasteful oocytes that only pose more risk or raise cost without improving fresh cycle LBR. TRIAL NUMBER: Being a retrospective study, prior registration of the trial was not required. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.