ReviewBMC surgery2025
Research progress in the treatment of gallstones with laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery: a narrative review.
Review in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Robotic surgery in the application of gallstones and related diseases: a 26-year bibliometric analysis and emerging research trends.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Intraoperative diagnosis and endoscopic management of iatrogenic common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A case report.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Clinical value of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in the treatment of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones: a retrospective analysis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Impact of opioid-free anesthesia on the overall benefit of analgesia score after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cholelithiasis, the formation of stones in the gallbladder, is a common surgical condition with an increasing incidence. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic gallstones due to its favorable outcomes. However, with increasing recognition of the gallbladder's importance, this procedure no longer aligns with patients' desire to preserve the organ. Technological advancements and surgical innovations have led to emerging approaches such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and cholangioscopy. This narrative review examines the current landscape of surgical interventions for gallstones, highlighting both gallbladder-preserving and removal approaches, and aims to provide insight into their respective outcomes and clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.