Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442746›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025

A co-created self-care and informal support intervention targeting women with gestational diabetes mellitus in northern Vietnam (VALID-II): a protocol for a two-arm non-randomised feasibility study.

Ditte S Linde, Hieu M Le, Dung T K Vu, Ngoc-Anh T Dang, Ai T Nguyen, Tuc P Vu, Xuan-Bai Nguyen, Cuong D Nguyen, Dan W Meyrowitsch, Jens Søndergaard and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05744856 (Living Together With Chronic Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05744856 nacompletednot on this map

Living Together With Chronic Disease: Informal Support for Diabetes Management in Vietnam (VALID) - Gestational Diabetes in Vietnam - Phase II

TypeinterventionalSponsorThai Binh University of Medicine and PharmacyRan2023 to 2025Enrolled435ConditionsGDMArmsSelf-care with informal support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ditte S LindeResearch unit for Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. dsondergaard@health.sdu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0851-6760
Hieu M LeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam.
Dung T K VuFaculty of Public Health, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam.
Ngoc-Anh T DangFaculty of Public Health, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam.
Ai T NguyenFaculty of Public Health, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam.
Tuc P VuFaculty of Public Health, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam.
Xuan-Bai NguyenDepartment of Histology, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam.
Cuong D NguyenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Resuscitation, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam.
Dan W MeyrowitschDepartment of Public Health, Global Health Section, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Christina A VinterResearch unit for Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Ib C BygbjergDepartment of Public Health, Global Health Section, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vibeke RaschResearch unit for Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Thanh D NguyenFaculty of Public Health, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam.
Tine M GammeltoftDepartment of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dang K NguyenDepartment of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam.

Funding

Danida Fellowship Centre 21-M03-KU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a transitory form of diabetes that presents during pregnancy with frequent adverse maternal and neonatal health consequences if left untreated. The prevalence of GDM is rapidly increasing in low- and middle-income countries such as Vietnam, and early sustainable interventions are important. The overall aim of this study-henceforth referred to as VALID-II-is to assess the feasibility of a co-created self-care and informal support intervention targeted at pregnant women with GDM. Further, the aim is to assess the potential efficacy of the intervention in reducing maternal and neonatal health complications compared with standard care.

methodsVALID-II is a two-site, two-arm, non-randomised feasibility intervention study in Thai Binh Province in northern Vietnam with a delayed start for the intervention group. The intervention study is nested in a larger cohort. In total, 2000 pregnant women will be screened for GDM, with an estimated 400 women screening positive according to the World Health Organisation-International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group diagnostic criteria. First, 200 women who screen positive for GDM will be assigned to a control group that will receive standard care. Among the 200 women, 20 will take part in an in-depth ethnographic study along with their family members, and the intervention will be co-created with them. Second, once the intervention has been created, 200 women will be assigned to the intervention group, which will receive the intervention plus standard care. Twenty women and their families from the intervention group will also take part in an ethnographic study. The primary outcome is to evaluate how feasible the self-care intervention is (composite outcome: recruitment, retention, and acceptability). Other secondary outcomes include the number of new-borns born large for gestational age, prevalence and risk factors for GDM, self-care agency, self-care, and breastfeeding practices. DISCUSSION: This study provides knowledge of the feasibility of informal/self-care and social support interventions and their preliminary impact on maternal and child health outcomes among women with GDM in northern Vietnam. Furthermore, it will inform parameters such as effect size and variance, which are essential for calculating the sample size needed to achieve the desired power in a future full-scale trial. This may guide decision makers in how to optimise the management of GDM in low- and middle-income contexts.

trial registrationNCT05744856. TRIAL STATUS: Recruiting.

Indexed as

Co-creationFeasibilityGDMInformal supportSelf-careTrialVietnam

Identifiers

PMID40442746
PMCPMC12121233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.