Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442741›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2025

Thermal effects of the anovo

Yuval Ramot, Sapir Hillel, Maor Mussan, Ronit Manor, Abraham Nyska

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuval RamotDepartment of Dermatology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Sapir HillelMomentis Surgical, Or Yehuda, Israel.
Maor MussanMomentis Surgical, Or Yehuda, Israel.
Ronit ManorMomentis Surgical, Or Yehuda, Israel.
Abraham NyskaConsultant in Toxicologic Pathology, Tel Aviv and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. anyska@nyska.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThermal damage during surgical procedures is a critical factor influencing patient safety and outcomes, particularly in minimally invasive laparoscopic surgeries. Advanced robotic-assisted surgical systems, such as the Anovo

methodsAn ex vivo study was conducted using 288 tissue samples from a swine model, including liver, kidney, and muscle tissues. Thermal effects during monopolar cutting and coagulation were evaluated at three power settings (low, medium, high) and durations (5, 10, 15 s). Histological analysis was performed on all samples to assess coagulation necrosis and thermal spread. Statistical equivalence testing was applied to compare the Anovo

resultsThe Anovo

conclusionThe Anovo

Indexed as

ElectrosurgeryHot TemperatureRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical InstrumentsAnimalsElectrodesEquipment DesignKidneyLaparoscopyLiverSwineAnovo® surgical systemCoagulation necrosisHistological analysisLaparoscopic surgeryMonopolar electrosurgeryRobotic-assisted surgerySurgical precisionThermal damage

Identifiers

PMID40442741
PMCPMC12121031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.