ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Evaluating the impact of metabolic indicators and scores on cardiovascular events using machine learning.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: a psychoneuroimmunological nexus linking depression and cardiovascular comorbidity.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Integrating frailty and cumulative lipid burden for stroke risk stratification: a machine learning-guided Athero-Frailty Score from the CHARLS cohort.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of Triglyceride/HDL-C Ratio for Unplanned Coronary Revascularization in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2025Article
- Gene-metabolite interactions in aortic dissection: Insights from metabolic and single-cell analyses.Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases such as coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and heart failure impact millions of people annually globally and are a major cause of disease and death. This study explores the predictive capabilities of novel metabolic indices (TyG, HOMA-IR, TG/HDL-C, and VAI) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and analyzes their relationships with diabetes and cardiovascular risks. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning from 2003 to 2018, we applied multiple machine learning algorithms to evaluate nine metabolic indicators including cholesterol levels, triglycerides, insulin, and waist circumference. Through cross-validation to validate model performance, the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated the most accurate performance in predicting cardiovascular outcomes, particularly for diseases like angina and heart failure. Additionally, SHAP value analysis confirmed the critical roles of waist circumference and METS-IR in predicting adverse cardiovascular events. Furthermore, we employed 100 machine learning algorithms to calculate the AUC values of metabolic indicators in predicting AP, CHD, HF, and MI, showing that METS-IR had the greatest contribution in these aspects. This research highlights the significance of metabolic indices in stratifying cardiovascular risks and presents potential avenues for targeted preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.