SynthesisBMC nephrology2025
Prevalence and influencing factors of pruritus in maintenance hemodialysis patients in China: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence and associated factors of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of different complementary therapies on chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Uremic Pruritus in Hemodialysis: Mechanisms, Burden, and Emerging Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease: a retrospective real-world study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A time-updated scoring system derived from a nomogram to predict 3-month mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- Global, regional, and national burdens of pruritus in children and adolescents aged under 20 years from 1990 to 2021: a trend analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the prevalence and influencing factors of Chronic Kidney Disease-associated Pruritus (CKD-aP) among maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients in China through a meta-analysis.
methodsA systematic computerized search was conducted across ten databases, including CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library, to identify studies on the prevalence and influencing factors of pruritus among Chinese hemodialysis patients up to January 2025. Two independent graduate students conducted literature screening, data extraction, and bias risk assessment for the included studies. Data analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software.
resultsA comprehensive meta-analysis of 27 studies involving 10,346 participants identified 5,968 cases of CKD-ap among hemodialysis patients, examining 30 potential influencing factors. The meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of CKD-ap in China was 52%, with 26% of patients experiencing mild CKD-ap, 22% moderate CKD-ap, and 8% severe CKD-ap. Factors associated with an increased risk of CKD-ap included duration of dialysis treatment (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.15-1.88), primary disease (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.87-1.99), dry skin disease (OR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.74-3.19), phosphorus (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.55-1.81), Ca - P product (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.14-3.22), C - reactive protein (CRP) (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.78-1.51), iPTH (OR = 2.45, 95% CI: 0.81-4.09), β
conclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrates a high prevalence of CKD-ap among Chinese MHD patients, underscoring the urgent need for improved awareness, preventive interventions, and management strategies in clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. TRIAL NUMBER: The study was registered in PROSPERO: No. CRD42024562865.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.