SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Potential of neoadjuvant hepatic artery perfusion chemotherapy in improving surgical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Tertiary Lymphoid Structure-Related Gene Signature Predicts Prognosis and Treatment Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.World journal of oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of adjuvant treatment with new hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) prior to hepatic resection in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
methodsA systematic review was conducted utilizing established databases and registries as of January 15, 2025, without imposing restrictions based on language, publication date, or status. The inclusion criteria were met by studies that examined the effects of HAlC, with or without surgical intervention, in comparison to surgical treatment alone. The primary outcomes encompassed overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), while secondary outcomes included recurrence rate and adverse events. A random effects model was employed to analyze the data.
resultsA total of 10 studies involving 1,014 patients were included. The results showed that preoperative HAlC improved patient survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence rates compared with surgical treatment alone. The most common grade 3 and higher adverse reactions in patients treated with preoperative HAIC included vomiting, leukopenia, neutropenia, hypothyroidism, and diarrhea.
conclusionPreoperative HAIC has been demonstrated to enhance survival outcomes in patients with resectable HCC; however, the clinical efficacy of this approach requires further validation through large-scale design studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.