Trial reportBMC public health2025
Effectiveness of a school-based oral health literacy promotion intervention: a randomized controlled trial (RCT) among adolescents.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Health Values, Oral Hygiene Habits, and Preventive Dental Attendance Among Health-Related and Non-Health-Related University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Promoting health equity through health literacy interventions in educational institutions: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness of culturally adapted oral health education in rural Quechua-speaking schoolchildren: a cluster quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveDespite the crucial role of oral health literacy (OHL) in improving oral health outcomes, structured educational interventions targeting adolescents remain limited. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a school-based intervention in enhancing OHL among female students.
methodsThis randomized controlled field trial was conducted with 140 female secondary school students in Gorgan, located in northern Iran. Four public schools participated in the study, with two schools randomly assigned to the experimental group (n = 70) and two to the control group (n = 70). The data collection tool was the valid and reliable Test of Oral Health Literacy in Adults (TOHLA), which consists of four domains: cognitive, behavioral, media, and communicational. Following the pre-test, essential needs assessments were conducted. Subsequently, the experimental group received training in four 45-minute sessions, delivered by a team of dentists and the researcher. The training methods included lectures, question-and-answer sessions, practical demonstrations (using models), and educational video clips. Participants were also provided with pamphlets and PowerPoint slides as educational media. Two months after the educational intervention, a post-test was administered to all students. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS Version 16. The statistical tests employed included the McNemar test, ANCOVA, paired t-test, independent t-test, and Chi-square test.
resultsThe intervention significantly improved the total OHL score, as well as its cognitive, behavioral, media, and communicational domains in the experimental group (P < 0.001). The control group showed a slight, yet significant, improvement only in the behavioral domain (P = 0.009), with no significant changes observed in the other domains.
conclusionThe study confirmed that a school-based educational intervention significantly improved oral health literacy (OHL) among female students. Significant increases were observed across all OHL domains in the experimental group, highlighting the effectiveness of structured interventions in promoting oral health awareness and behaviors among adolescents. While the study confirmed the intervention's effectiveness, it was limited to female students; future research should explore diverse populations and examine long-term effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.