ArticleBMC medical education2025
Designing a cultivation model for top-notch students in basic medicine: a Delphi method.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a Clinical Management Pathway for Perioperative Nutritional Risk in Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Chinese government initiated the "Top-notch Students Training Program 2.0 for Basic Disciplines" to cultivate talent in foundational fields, including basic medicine. However, existing programs lack a systematic framework tailored to the specific needs of basic medicine students. This study proposes a novel cultivation model specifically designed for basic medicine students, integrating interdisciplinary research and addressing the unique challenges inherent in foundational medical education. Compared to existing international models such as MSTP in the U.S., which focuses predominantly on streamlined clinical-research integration, and WISE in Japan, emphasizing productivity through targeted doctoral training, this model uniquely incorporates comprehensive interdisciplinary teaching, structured research training mechanisms, and explicit quality assurance procedures. These enhancements specifically address previously identified gaps in holistic, systematic cultivation frameworks for top-notch basic medicine students, aligning closely with national educational strategies and global healthcare challenges.
methodsThis study employed a modified Delphi method conducted over three rounds. An initial indicator framework was developed by analyzing documents from 12 universities, primarily those participating in the "Top-notch Students Training Program 2.0 for Basic Disciplines."Experts specializing in medical education and academic management were invited to evaluate the relevance and importance of the proposed indicators. During each Delphi round, experts provided ratings and qualitative feedback, which informed iterative refinements of the framework. Adjustments were made based on statistical thresholds (e.g., arithmetic mean < 4, full score ratio < 0.5, or variation coefficient > 0.25) and expert consensus. The process concluded with a finalized cultivation model, incorporating 5 primary indicators, 17 secondary indicators, and 63 tertiary indicators. To validate the model, statistical analysis was conducted to ensure its reliability, practicality, and alignment with the goals of top-notch student cultivation in basic medicine. The finalized framework emphasizes interdisciplinary integration, innovation, and research-based learning, reflecting the priorities identified in the Delphi process.
resultsThe effective response rates for the three rounds were 84%, 100%, and 95%, respectively, with an expert authority coefficient of 0.89. Based on these consultations, the final model includes 5 primary indicators, 17 secondary indicators, and 63 tertiary indicators. The model emphasizes five core dimensions: cultivation philosophy, cultivation standards and objectives, curriculum and teaching, scientific research training, and quality assurance and evaluation.
conclusionsThe proposed model emphasizes a systematic approach, adaptability to environmental changes, and practical operability in the cultivation process. The five core dimensions-cultivation philosophy, cultivation standards and objectives, curriculum and teaching, scientific research training, and quality assurance and evaluation-are designed to work in harmony. This ensures seamless alignment throughout the cultivation process, promoting synergy between elements to optimize pathways for top-notch students in basic medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.