ArticleBMC public health2025
The relative validity of the updated Menzies Remote Short-Item Dietary Assessment Tool (MRSDAT) for use with remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and adults.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to determine the relative validity of dietary quality index scores estimated using the updated version of the Menzies Remote Short-item Dietary Assessment Tool (MRSDAT), a food frequency questionnaire developed for use with remote Indigenous communities in Australia.
methodsThis validation study compares scores derived from the updated MRSDAT with those derived from 24-h recalls. Participants from nine remote communities across three discrete regions of Australia (Central Australia, North Northern Territory and Cape York) participated in June-September 2021, or May-July 2022. Participants were Indigenous children aged six months to five years, pregnant and/or breastfeeding Indigenous women, and overweight adult Indigenous males and females. The agreement between methods was explored using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), Bland-Altman plots, weighted Cohen's kappa, paired samples t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Primary comparisons were completed for the whole sample, and primary and secondary comparisons for only participants with ≥ 2 × 24 h recalls.
resultsNinety-nine participants were recruited. The MRSDAT estimated dietary quality index scores 0.31/100 points higher than 24-h recall estimates for participants with ≥ 2 × 24-h recalls, and 0.18/100 points higher for all participants, with consistent results for adults and children (CCC = Rc 0.58, 95% CI 0.39, 0.72).
conclusionsUpdates to the MRSDAT have resulted in dietary quality index scores highly comparable to those derived from 24-h recalls. The MRSDAT has the practical advantages of speed and convenience for research purposes, and the built-in instant dietary feedback feature has application to service delivery settings given the robust results demonstrated in this validation study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.