Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
Comparison of the effects of two different local anesthetics used in spinal anesthesia on peripheral and central temperature change: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, we aimed to compare the effects of two different local anesthetics with different baricity used in spinal anesthesia on thermoregulation. MATERIALS AND
methodsOur study was conducted on forty full-term pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia. At an operating room temperature of twenty-four degrees Celsius, peripheral body temperature was measured using temperature probes attached to the lower medial parts of the same side's lower and upper extremities, and central body temperature was measured with a tympanic thermometer. Isobaric levobupivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine were used in spinal anesthesia applications. After spinal anesthesia, tympanic temperature, arm and leg temperatures, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were measured and recorded at baseline, the first, third, and fifth minutes, and every five minutes thereafter until the end of surgery.
resultsIn the bupivacaine group, a decrease in tympanic temperature was observed at the third minute and an increase in leg skin temperature at the fifth minute compared to baseline values. In the levobupivacaine group, a decrease in tympanic temperature was observed at the fifth minute, and an increase in leg skin temperature was observed at the third minute. In both groups, within-group comparisons showed a continued decrease in tympanic temperature and increase in leg temperature at all subsequent time points compared to baseline. No statistically significant difference was observed in arm skin temperatures within groups in either group.
conclusionWe observed that the effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine and isobaric levobupivacaine used in spinal anesthesia on thermoregulation were similar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.