ArticleBMC public health2025
Inclusion in the cancer patient pathway among cancer patients with and without pre-existing mental or substance use disorders: a nationwide register-based study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer patients with a pre-existing mental disorder or substance use disorder (SUD) have a poorer prognosis compared to other cancer patients, with suboptimal routes to diagnosis and treatment as possible contributing factors. Shorter intervals from suspicion of cancer to start of cancer treatment have been observed following the implementation of Cancer Patient Pathways (CPP) in the Nordic countries, which may have led to a better prognosis. We aimed to investigate whether incident cancer patients with and without pre-existing mental disorder or SUD were equally likely to be included in a CPP. We also investigated the associations between pre-existing mental disorder or SUD and low primary care utilization, and cancers diagnosed post-emergency or close to death in non-CPP enrolees.
methodsThis population-based registry study included incident cancer patients aged 21-79 between 2015 and 2018 (n = 65,328). Information on pre-existing mental disorders or SUD was gathered from national registries of primary and specialised health care, prescriptions, and disability diagnosis. Propensity score analyses using inverse probability weighting along with the McNemar test were performed to evaluate the risk of non-inclusion in any CPP for all cancers combined, lifestyle-related cancers combined, and the most common cancers individually.
resultsCancer patients with pre-existing mental disorder or SUD had an 8% (RR = 1.08; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.03-1.13) higher risk of non-enrolment in a CPP. Patients with prior hospitalisation for mental disorder or SUD, and patients with pre-existing psychosis or depression were at particular risk of non-inclusion in a CPP compared to controls, especially for cancers that often present with symptoms late in the course of the disease, such as lung cancer. In line with this, patients with pre-existing mental disorder or SUD who were not referred to a CPP faced a 34% (RR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.18-1.53%) increased risk of unrecognised cancer close to death.
conclusionsCancer patients with pre-existing mental disorder or SUD have an increased risk of non-inclusion in a CPP. If not included in a CPP, they have an increased risk of having unrecognised cancer close to death. By addressing barriers to CPP-inclusion, and enhancing the quality of diagnostic and treatment services, healthcare systems could achieve better cancer outcomes for vulnerable patient groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.