Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442564›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Standardizing Heterogeneous MRI Series Description Metadata Using Large Language Models.

Peter I Kamel, Florence X Doo, Dharmam Savani, Adway Kanhere, Paul H Yi, Vishwa S Parekh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter I KamelDepartment of Neuroradiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. peterkamelmd.correspondence@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-9801
Florence X DooDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Dharmam SavaniDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Adway KanhereUniversity of Maryland Institute for Health Computing, North Bethesda, MD, USA.
Paul H YiDepartment of Radiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Vishwa S ParekhDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI metadata, particularly free-text series descriptions (SDs) used to identify sequences, are highly heterogeneous due to variable inputs by manufacturers and technologists. This variability poses challenges in correctly identifying series for hanging protocols and dataset curation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of large language models (LLMs) to automatically classify MRI SDs. We analyzed non-contrast brain MRIs performed between 2016 and 2022 at our institution, identifying all unique SDs in the metadata. A practicing neuroradiologist manually classified the SD text into: "T1," "T2," "T2/FLAIR," "SWI," "DWI," ADC," or "Other." Then, various LLMs, including GPT 3.5 Turbo, GPT-4, GPT-4o, Llama 3 8b, and Llama 3 70b, were asked to classify each SD into one of the sequence categories. Model performances were compared to ground truth classification using area under the curve (AUC) as the primary metric. Additionally, GPT-4o was tasked with generating regular expression templates to match each category. In 2510 MRI brain examinations, there were 1395 unique SDs, with 727/1395 (52.1%) appearing only once, indicating high variability. GPT-4o demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an average AUC of 0.983 ± 0.020 for all series with detailed prompting. GPT models significantly outperformed Llama models, with smaller differences within the GPT family. Regular expression generation was inconsistent, demonstrating an average AUC of 0.774 ± 0.161 for all sequences. Our findings suggest that LLMs are effective for interpreting and standardizing heterogeneous MRI SDs.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMetadataBrainHumansLanguageLarge Language ModelsDICOM meta-dataHarmonizationLarge language modelsSeries descriptionsStandardization

Identifiers

PMID40442564
PMCPMC12921075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.