Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442555›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2025

Family Planning and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Catherine Sims, Mehret Birru Talabi

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine SimsDurham Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Duke University, 40 Duke Medicine Circle Clinic 1 J, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. cas206@duke.edu.
Mehret Birru TalabiDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) need tailored guidance when it comes to family planning decisions, including contraception, pregnancy, and breastfeeding. To achieve the best reproductive health outcomes, a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach is essential. This article aims to support healthcare providers in addressing key reproductive health concerns for both male and female patients, such as timing conception, infertility, and the management of RA medications during pregnancy and lactation. RECENT

findingsSome women with RA may experience subfertility, however assisted reproductive technology is a safe option. RA disease activity may change for some women during pregnancy, but this is influenced by disease activity going into pregnancy and medication use in pregnancy. Pregnancy complications are more common among women with RA compared to the general population, which may be explained, in part, by disease activity, extra-articular manifestations of RA, and/or use of certain medications. Neonates exposed to biologic medications in utero can receive all recommended vaccinations. Contraception, including emergency contraception, is safe for women with RA. Preliminary data suggests pregnancy termination is safe in women with RA and does not increase the risk for disease flare. RA is a chronic inflammatory disease that can impact both women and men during their reproductive years. Rheumatologists have an essential role in patient's reproductive health and family planning. This article highlights key considerations and offers strategies to assist providers in understanding and supporting their patients' reproductive goals.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidFamily Planning ServicesPregnancy ComplicationsAntirheumatic AgentsBreast FeedingContraceptionFemaleHumansMalePregnancyAntirheumatic AgentsContraceptionFertilityLactationPregnancyRheumatoid arthritisWomen’s health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.